HQ Special Operations Command Central Press Release on SO2 McCabe’s not guilty verdict:

May 6, 2010, Norfolk, Va.  – Earlier today, a Special court-martial comprised of four Naval Officers and three Enlisted members found SO2 (SEAL) Matthew McCabe not guilty of assaulting an Iraqi detainee.  This was the third court-martial related to the assault that was alleged to have occurred on September 1, 2009 in Iraq.  SO1 (SEAL) Julio Huertas and SO2 (SEAL) Jonathan Keefe had been found not guilty of related charges at Special courts-martial held in Iraq last month.  

Upon learning of the verdict, Maj. Gen. Charles Cleveland, the Special court-martial convening authority, remarked, “I take my responsibility as a commander and convening authority very seriously and did not make the decision to refer these charges to courts-martial lightly.  While I had preferred to handle the incident administratively, Petty Officers Huertas, McCabe and Keefe exercised their right to have this matter handled by a court-martial.  The evidence  presented reasonable grounds to believe that offenses had been committed and that Petty Officers Huertas, McCabe, and Keefe had committed those offenses.  In the interests of justice and to maintain good order and discipline, I chose to proceed with the courts-martial. 

“I would like to extend my thanks and appreciation to the Naval Officers and Sailors who served as members in these cases.  They were given a difficult duty and accomplished it in a very professional manner.  I would also like to extend my sincere appreciation to the military trial and defense counsel, as well as to the civilian defense counsel, who handled this case.  Their efforts in pursuing the interests of justice and protecting the rights of the Sailors accused in these cases are outstanding examples of their dedication to protecting and defending our Constitution.

“Despite the opinion of some of those who preferred that these charges not proceed, I allowed these charges to go forward because I truly believe that the best process known for uncovering the truth, when the facts are contested, is that process which is found in our adversarial justice system.  There is no better way to discover the truth than by presenting evidence to an unbiased panel of members, having witnesses testify under oath, and having that testimony subject to vigorous cross-examination.

“Incidents such as the ones alleged in this case carry strategic implications for U.S. forces and U.S. National Security and ultimately cost the lives of Americans.  I will continue to take allegations such as this seriously, investigating them whenever they are brought to my attention, and acting on them when the evidence so dictates.  I look forward to SO1 (SEAL) Huertas, SO2(SEAL) McCabe, and SO2(SEAL) Keefe returning to their Team and continuing their duties in defending our great Nation.”

Lt. Col. Holly Silkman, spokesman for Special Operations Command Central, added, “General Cleveland is satisfied that the military justice process has been executed fairly and that thorough due process was carried out during the course of these three trial proceedings, consistent with the rule of law and the values of U.S. military justice that we fight to preserve as members of the U.S. military and as American citizens.”

{ 0 comments }

2nd Navy SEAL Not Guilty

by JAG Lawyer on 23 April 2010

in Military Justice

Fox News reports that Petty Officer 2nd Class Jonathan Keefe found not guilty of dereliction of duty.  Here’s the lowdown:

Defense lawyers…seized on inconsistencies in DeMartino’s testimony and questioned the credibility of Abed, a suspected terrorist, to raise doubt about their versions of events. They also relied on evidence recycled from Huertas’ trial in claiming that Abed could have bit his lip to make himself bleed on his clothing.

Compared to McCabe, Keefe and Huertas faced relatively minor charges as neither were accused of assaulting Abed. Keefe and Huertas chose to have their trials held in Iraq, so they could face Abed in court. McCabe waived that legal right.

Since we know these cases turn on the slightest variation of application of law to fact, there’s still plenty of suspense for McCabe’s trial.  Speaking of facts, I can’t help but recall the “fact dance” that one of my zany law school professors perform for the class on a regular basis.  Let’s just say it was interesting…

{ 0 comments }

Navy SEAL ~ Not Guilty

by JAG Lawyer on 22 April 2010

in Military Justice, military news

The testimony and the result

A six-man jury found Petty Officer 1st Class Julio Huertas, 29, of Blue Island, Illinois, not guilty of charges of dereliction of duty and attempting to influence the testimony of another service member. The jury spent two hours deliberating the verdict. [Source: Fox News]

Looks like turning down the 15 works out sometimes.  Time for round two tomorrow.

{ 0 comments }

The Washington Post reports that the first Navy SEAL court-martial got underway in Iraq on Wednesday.  The government’s star witness also provided what will likely be the most damning testimony of the event. 

Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Kevin Demartino, who is not a SEAL and was assigned to process and transport Ahmed Hashim Abed after his capture, testified he saw Petty Officer 2nd Class Matthew McCabe punch the prisoner, and blood come from the prisoner’s mouth.

He admitted initially lying when questioned about why the prisoner was injured, telling the court: “I wasn’t prepared to rat those guys out” but then said he changed his mind when it became clear there would be an investigation.

Coming forward was “the hardest thing I’ve done in my life,” he testified. “It’s a SEAL team, it’s a life changing event. It’s something I’ll have to live with for the rest of my life.”

On a personal note, based on a text message I received from my mother two days ago, I think she believes I’m in Iraq at this trial right now… maybe I should answer her text…

{ 0 comments }

CAAFlog update on SEAL Cases

by JAG Lawyer on 19 April 2010

in Military Justice

CAAFlog continues to provide well-reasoned and balanced analysis of the three Navy SEAL cases edging closer to trial this week (if mother nature cooperates…).  It’s interesting to see the variety of legal directions that three related cases can take based on minor variances of fact.  It also certainly illustrates the importance of everyone in the investigative chain dotting their “i’s” and crossing their “t’s,” especially in a case potentially subject to intense media scrutiny.  Lots of Monday morning quarterbacking…isn’t it fun?

{ 1 comment }

False Official Statement Charge Dropped Against Two SEALs

April 7, 2010

Things appear to be going downhill a bit for the government in the Navy SEAL cases.  Following the recent ruling by the military judge to exclude Petty Officers Keefe and Huertas’ statements that they did not see the detainee struck by any of their cohorts, the government has dropped the false official statement charges against [...]

Read the full article…

Lawyers Puzzle Over Civilian Versus Military Juries

April 2, 2010

The April 2010 issue of ABA Journal has an article comparing supposedly disparate results of civilian and military juries. The soldiers drank whiskey and played cards at a traffic checkpoint they maintained near Yousifiyah, Iraq, about 20 miles southwest of Baghdad, when Army Pfc. Steven Dale Green and three comrades hatched the idea of raping [...]

Read the full article…

Knockout Trial Lawyer Tips

April 1, 2010

This month’s edition of ABA e-News had an interesting interview with seasoned trial strategist, G. Christopher Ritter. He provided some keys for successful navigation of the world of jury trials (“members” in the military), something that JAGs usually get to experience early on in their careers. Here are the main points: The trial lawyer’s main [...]

Read the full article…